Joined
·
1,402 Posts
You are wrong. The ETA 2824 has no license, so any company can produce it. How can it therefore be counterfeit? It performs in all positions very well on a timegrapher. I have owned several watches with this movement, and performs as well as ETA 2825, Sellta SW200, and the STP 1.11. As you probably know, there are numerous clones of the ETA 2824, is it all of them you have an issue with, or just this one?Their web page reads like a scam email, teeming with typos, not unlike myself. I couldn't bite.
"this is the Chineese Clone of the ETA 2824...it's > ? It's equal to or better than the Swiss movements?
"you can buy it with the SW200 inside...it's only a Swiss made version of the same caliber"
You should've said "it's only a swiss made version of the counterfit"
Leave it to the grapher to find The superior counterfit.
Thanks Tom. There are some watch snobs who will dismiss because it is a Chinese brand, but like I said in the review, there are many watches branded as being U.S, Singapore, or European, that are in actual fact made in China. Even the Swiss watch industry use many Chinese parts. Apart from the fact Chinese parts are cheaper, they also have the technology and tooling to produce very high quality parts. Some enthusiasts won't like hearing it, but the brushing on the Proxima is as good as my Tudor BB36Thanks so so much for not only doing this review Wiggles, but for also
showing another brand not all of us may know about !!! 😎🏆 ..I know
that I appreciate and that a lot of others do as well.
Another thing I appreciate is when companies lode homages, that they
change things up a little. Which is what they did here with everything
from the size, to hands, bezel and more. It’s great when you can have
a classic, or even new design but with a twist that sets it apart a little.
While at the same time seeming as timeless, or classic as can be. It’s
pretty terrific from my view over here sir. I mean it’s honestly stunning
if I’m being honest. Which as you know, I always try to be. It’s a watch
people will think is thousands of $, not hundreds and that’s cool.
On top of that, I really don’t see or can’t find negatives with this Diver.
It does everything you or we might watch a watch to do and it once
again does without putting too much of a hurting on the wallet. 🙂
Thanks Tom. There are some watch snobs who will dismiss because it is a Chinese brand, but like I said in the review, there are many watches branded as being U.S, Singapore, or European, that are in actual fact made in China. Even the Swiss watch industry use many Chinese parts. Apart from the fact Chinese parts are cheaper, they also have the technology and tooling to produce very high quality parts. Some enthusiasts won't like hearing it, but the brushing on the Proxima is as good as my Tudor BB36
Yes, I’m wrong. I know that calibers can and will be copied, or cloned, as you put it in your video…which I do appreciate (sincerely), regardless of my take on the subject matter.You are wrong. The ETA 2824 has no license, so any company can produce it. How can it therefore be counterfeit? It performs in all positions very well on a timegrapher. I have owned several watches with this movement, and performs as well as ETA 2825, Sellta SW200, and the STP 1.11. As you probably know, there are numerous clones of the ETA 2824, is it all of them you have an issue with, or just this one?
With all due respect I didn't say the PT5000 is better than any Swiss equivalent, I said they often leave the factory better regulated. Over the years I have received Sellita and ETA movements running over 20 spd fast, the most inaccurate PT5000 is on this video, running at -6 spd. The watch in question far from being luxury watch standard, but is amazing value for money. Here is a link to their website, it may be different to the one you viewed?Yes, I’m wrong. I know that calibers can and will be copied, or cloned, as you put it in your video…which I do appreciate (sincerely), regardless of my take on the subject matter.
You bragged they’re superior to Swiss originals… curiously I looked Poxima up,
In the US, we get scam emails and text messages, and blatant frauds; typos alone reveal it.
Proxima's website reads like a scam message.
So, mighty Proxima has the power and prowess to trump Swiss engines…but they can’t proofread?
A legit fraud can be proofread…let alone a great one.
I wouldn’t have said a word if their website was great, or legit.
“What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun’’.
Your claim that the brushing on it is as good as your BB. You must have bought a nasty Tudor beat up beyond comprehension. Yes, I've had both in hand.Thanks Tom. There are some watch snobs who will dismiss because it is a Chinese brand, but like I said in the review, there are many watches branded as being U.S, Singapore, or European, that are in actual fact made in China. Even the Swiss watch industry use many Chinese parts. Apart from the fact Chinese parts are cheaper, they also have the technology and tooling to produce very high quality parts. Some enthusiasts won't like hearing it, but the brushing on the Proxima is as good as my Tudor BB36
LOL, I don't think I have ever kept a watch that longIt looks like a good watch, let’s see how it becomes in a couple of years.
Not at ll, my BB36 was almost new when I bought it. The brushing on the Proxima is outstanding. Let's not forget, some luxury brands, such as Breitling source their cases from China, and why shouldn't they?Your claim that the brushing on it is as good as your BB. You must have bought a nasty Tudor beat up beyond comprehension. Yes, I've had both in hand.