Watch Freeks banner

My diminished interest in accuracy

515 views 15 replies 10 participants last post by  GoodWatch  
#1 ·
25 years ago, I owned a Rolex 16610, the first Sub that came with solid end links. I was more than chuffed with the fact it came with a C.O.S.C. movement, the ‘Superlative Chronometer’ in Rolex parlance. I even wrote Rolex a letter to ask for the ‘Attestation de Marche’. That is the document on which all the measurements are recorded. And I received the polite answer that Rolex does not supply these documents.

A couple of years before I was given an atomic time signal (DCF77) receiver that was connected to a server in our network to provide very accurate time. It became superfluous the moment we switched to NTP. Because it was a box with its own power supply it could also be used stand-alone as it had a display. Halfway that decade it stopped working because the signal was transmitted in a different way and the receiver could no longer decode the pulses.

But for years and years I found time accuracy very important, perhaps too important. Bordering on the obsessive even. This has almost completely vanished. I cannot name an appointment or cooking instruction where plus or minus 1 second is that important. Or even 10 seconds.

This new ‘feeling’ has helped me a lot in accepting the fact that the watches I own and still buy come with movements that have an accuracy of plus or minus 15 seconds per day. Some are more accurate and under the right circumstances reach 5 seconds but most do not. In every day life this poses no problem what so ever. I put all my appointments and reminders in the calendar on my iPhone (dentist, new contact lenses, watering plants, lunch with a friend or my daughter, etc.) and that gives me the cue. So the (un)accuracy of my watches has no influence on that.

I’m free! :)
 
#2 ·
:giggle::LOL:

I am with you Frans, as although accuracy is an important aspect of
telling time, it's not that important to me either anymore. And when
you consider the fact that we all have a digital clock at every turn
around us, or even on our phones, the accuracy of the watch on
our wrist maybe doesn't have to be perfect. :) You, or I, or all of
us can have that + or - a ceratin amount of seconds per day, and
live with it right? lol

Honestly, I think I have been more about the watches themselves,
and liking the case designs, or dial set-up, as well as the magic of
the watches themselves, rather than telling time. ..I know it must
sound strange. 😊It's fun to talk about though, as well as hear that
you kind of think the same now too. ;)

Cannot thank you enough for the super cool post Frans !!! ..I wonder
what everyone else thinks, or has to say. ✨
 
#3 ·
It are for sure the machines themselves Tom. I fully agree with this. Sure, a one minute deviation per day is not wanted but as long as the watches are able to keep reasonably good time, the way they look and feel is more important.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FBPB and Reflex
#7 ·
Same here. If the watch is new and doesn't keep time within the quoted spec, then there is likely a problem of some sort. When it's been on my wrist for 6 months to a year, taking the bumps and knocks that it does, I am a lot more forgiving...
 
#10 ·
I’m in the middle on this. I care about accuracy because I think it’s a factor of the quality. That said, the cost of any particular watch changes how much I care about its accuracy.

Two perfect examples of this are my Rolex 116610LN Sub which after 6 years of owning is around perfect. If I wear all day and rest it crown up at night it takes about a week to be +1/spd!!!

On the other end of the spectrum, I had a Seiko SPB147 Prospex. It was beautiful, I was absolutely in love with the burst dial which was just barely brown. Such a gorgeous watch. However, I dropped around $1000USD on it and it was at the max for Seiko tolerance of +30/spd. I thought that was pretty outrageous for a $1k watch. I sold it. Now I wish I would have just tried to regulate it myself but I was just frustrated by the cost/accuracy.

All that said, if I bought a Seiko for $300 or less, or a Seiko based custom/independent I’d be perfectly fine with +-30. Like the NH34 custom I got recently. It’s around +15 and I’m thrilled with that!

Image




Image



Image
 
#11 ·
I was never a stickler about accuracy, when I was working onsite I would put my watch on in the morning before heading out to work look at the kitchen wall and check out the Seiko quartz clock, then check my wrist, if my watch and clock were in sync within a minute before walking out the doorI was fine, if the watch was off by a couple minutes or more I would set the watch accordingly. Some of the watches I own always seemed to be within the minute, like my JLC, Rolex, and Omega; others, like my Seikos and Orient Star, occasionally had to be changed. When I started working at home, I still checked the wall clock, but being that I was no longer on the clock, I would do so more casually. Today, I still check to see if the watch is in sync with the clock even when I am in Thailand but do so casually because in Thailand things are much more relaxed. If I was to get upset over my watches gaining or losing more than a minute in 24 hours, I would probably have to sell some watches and others get serviced, so I am just happy with the way things are. I am on Thai time anyway where everybody is late, so why stress over a minute or two.
 
#14 ·
It's kind of fun to see how watches do vs time.gov. But, as long as they keep good time and don't make me late for meetings, I'm good. I do have one old Orient Five Star watch that isn't hand windable. I think I'd have to get a job as an aerobics instructor to keep that one going overnight. It's spot on for time, but won't last for more than an hour or two off the wrist.
Image
 
#16 ·
4 seconds per hour is a bit steep :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: GatorDude and FBPB